There’s a New Sheriff in Town!
This is the latest news about that..that..long race, that… that 2.4
mile swim, 112 mile bike and 26.2 mile run distance… that 140.6
distance…..hang on, let me check with my lawyer… okay, I can say it here – that
“Ironman distance” with an upper case "I".
Achieving
a goal at the ironman distance is hard enough without having to deal with
rules. For most athletes it’s the basic 3: no drafting, no blocking, and no
outside assistance. But it might be time to refresh your knowledge on the rules
‘cuz there’s a new sheriff in town and its name is Global Tri Group.
Our nation’s triathlon governing body,
USA Triathlon has butted heads with another big entity, World
Triathlon Corporation (WTC) – more commonly know as Ironman. WTC
wanted to tweak some rules at Mdot races but USAT won’t allow it, so WTC
invented the GTG (Global Tri Group). All this reminds me of Robin
Williams in Good Morning Vietnam who said “If the V.P. is such a V.I.P. then
his P.C. should be put on the Q.T. ‘cuz if it gets out to the V.C. then they’ll
all be put on K.P.”- but, I digress!
One of
the biggest issues is with bike penalties. WTC wants them to be dealt
with during the race. So the marshal is supposed to pull over the cyclist and
mark the offending athlete’s number. Then that athlete would have to
serve the penalty time either right there on the side of the road, or they
would have to sit in the penalty box before they entered the second
transition and started the run.
What’s
good about this is that spectators, especially those watching via television,
can easily identify who is in the lead on the run. If the athlete who is
physically leading is carrying a penalty and is really 3 minutes behind the
second place athlete who is only a minute and a half behind, then the second
place guy is really in the lead and that can be a bit confusing for the
average Lazy Boy denizen – or anyone who reads that last sentence.
What
USAT mandates is that the marshal simply rides behind the lawbreaking athlete,
marks down the athlete’s number, the infraction, and the time penalty to be
assessed, and then moves on down the road. Then it becomes the athlete’s
responsibility to study the results after the finish, check if there’s a
penalty assessed on them, and, if need be, dispute the penalty with the
official in a small window of time after the race. What’s good about this is
that it leaves room for errors to be corrected. All USAT officials are
capable of basic human error and this method helps deal with those errors.
What’s bad about this approach is it
doesn’t help the athletes. Both USAT and WTC are big pieces in our little
sport and we would all be better served if they could choke down the ego a bit
and compromise. If you’re headed to an Mdot event in the near future
click to:
http://globaltrigroup.com
and educate yourself.
Other articles in this series:
» Big Race Qualifying -
Kona, USAT National Championships,
XTERRA Maui
- what's it take?
» Avoid the PANIC that
so many stumble into at the start of the swim
» Olympics in Athens and how
athletes try and make the grade
» Another course change at the IM
World Championships
» Put your mind to work
in your favor before and during the race with
visualizations
» Triathlon, the Olympics, and
the Evolution
» Triathlon Keeps Inching
Towards Mainstream
» Slowtwitch's Kona Survey
Back to the Multi-Resource
|